Byks NBAA: Biggin s big in London
Boeing has further delayed the 777-9 programme, saying it intends to deliver the first of the aircraft type in late 2023.The decision, which Boeing disclosed on 27 January, marks another in a string of 777X programme delays. The company had most recently said it would deliver the 777-9, the first 777X variant, in 2022.At one point it intended to deliver the jet in 2020.Source: BoeingBoeings second flight-test 777-9, WH002 , takes off from Paine Field in Everett, Washington on its maiden flight on 30 April 2020. Boeing now anticipates that the f <a href=https://www.cups-stanley.ca>stanley canada ir stanley cups uk st 777X delivery will occur in late 2023, the airframer says, adding that it has also recorded a pre-tax charge on the 777X programme of $6.5 billion. The schedule, and the associate financial impact, reflect a number of factors, including an updated assessment of global certification requirements, the companys latest assessment of t stanley mug he Covid-19 pandemic on market demand and discussions with customers with respect to aircraft delivery timing, Boeing says.Boeing adds that it continues having ongoing communication with civil aviation authorities .The schedule change and charge also reflect adjustments to production rates and the programme accounting quantity, increased change incorporation costs and associated customer and supply change impacts.The 777-9 is in flight testing, which began in January 2020.Boeing had previously hinted that it might further delay the 777X programme amid suggestions that the aircraft might face heightened Gqpu A320neo delivery levels slide over engine hitch
The BDN Opinion section operates independently and does not set news policies or contribute to reporting or editing articles elsewhere <a href=https://www.stanley-cups-uk.uk>stanley cup in the newspaper or on聽bangordailynewsTyler Cowen is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist, a professor of economics at George Mason University and host of the Marginal Revolution blog.Donald Trumps return to the White House meansthat one of his signature issues will soon return to the center of Washingtons economic policy agenda: tariffs. And while the evidence of their harm continues to grow, which is why economists like me stanley us oppose them, economists like me should also admit that tariffs probably matter less than wed like to think.Trump has promised to impose stiff tariffs of up to 60 percent on China, as well as lower tariffs on other trading partners, and some members of the conservative intelligentsia are cheering him on. They make several arguments, but at least one is increasingly tenuous: that 19th-century tariffs, whic stanley cup h reached 35 percent in the 1890s, helped build the U.S. into an industrial power.A new paperfrom the National Bureau of Economic Research shows that tariffs probably did more harm than good. Using meticulously collected industry-level and state-level data, the paper traces the impact of specific tariff rates more clearly than before. The results are not pretty.One core finding is that industries with higher tariffs did not have higher productivity 鈥?in fact, they had lower productivity. Tariffs did raise the number of U.S. firms