Jacv A MeToo backlash was inevitable
Lucknow: Muslim leaders in Uttar Pradesh have termed the Varanasi district court orders as an infringement on the powers of the Supreme Court and Parliament which have made it crystal clear that no further changes could be made at religious sites as per the Places of Worship Act. Maulana Khaliq Ahmad Khan, executive member of All India Milli Council and former plaintiff in Babri Masjid case, said: The objection of the Muslim side in the Gyanvapi case was based on the Places of Worship Act, whic <a href=https://www.owala-waterbottle.ca>owala h restricted any change in religious places. It is an Act passed by the Indian Parliament, confirmed by a co hydrojug traveler nstitutional bench of the Supreme Court. And now, a district court is encroaching upon the power of the hydrojug canada SC and Parliament. Also ReadElgar Parishad case: Activist Vernon Gonsalves withdraws medical bail plea Maulana Khalid Rasheed Firangi Mahali of Islamic Centre of India, said: For the last 350 years, Muslims have been offering namaz at Gyanvapi mosque and suddenly they are being asked to stop the practice. The Places of Worship Act passed by Parliament and held by the Supreme Court cannot be ignored. I demand that both Hindu and Muslim parties should settle the matter outside the court with dialogues. Maulana Yasoob Abbas, general secretary of the All India Shia Muslim Personal Law Board, has also called for an out-of-court settlement of the matter. TagsGyanvapi Gyanvapi mosque Muslims Varanasi Indo-Asian News Service Dzyy Trump s accidental call to action
High-profile arbitrator Kenneth R. Feinberg has submitted a friend-of-the-court brief in the litigation backing New England Patriots quarterback Tom Bradys four-game suspension fight against the NFL over Deflategate.The AFL-CIO also filed a friend-of-the-court brief on Monday asking the 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals to reconsi <a href=https://www.owalas.com.de>owala tumbler der a decision handed down by a three-judge panel in April that reinstated Bradys four-game suspension.The circuit court panel ruled in April that NFL commissioner Roger Goodell was within the rights of polene france the collective bargaining agreement to suspend Brady four games after the suspension was firs owala t overturned by U.S. District Court Judge Richard Berman last year.Feinberg helped divide the funds for Sept. 11 and Boston Marathon bombing victims.Feinberg cited his three decades of experience as an arbitrator and special master and said the high-profile nature of this case 鈥?has serious potential to affect public confidence in the arbitration process. Mr. Feinberg comes before this court not to support the unfettered aggrandizement of arbitral powers for he and his fellow arbitrators 鈥?but to caution against it, Feinbergs brief states.Feinberg said in his brief that Goodell impermissibly exceeded the scope of his authority. But more troubling, he used the vehicle of arbitration as a mechanism to rewrite the underlying bargain between the parties, to the sole advantage of his organization. If this type of bias or capricious notions of industrial justice